RETHINKING RELIGIOSITY AND FUNDAMENTALISM

Family of the Heart - DIALOGUE & DISCUSSIONS 

AS CLEAR AS MUD

Dear Abrar, Thank you very much for inviting us to your place for a delicious dinner and a passionate dialogue. I thoroughly enjoyed the evening. Extend my thanks to Roohi. Since we could not conclude our discussion I want to share some comments and ask some questions. Your literary piece

Confessions of a Religious Fundamentalist (On a gun point)

was a wonderful piece from a creative writing point of view but from a conceptual point of view it was as clear as mud. I felt utterly confused because it seems to me that you wanted to challenge the more traditional or more conventional meanings of certain terms without giving your own meanings or new interpretations. In my opinion as a reader your creation was successful as a creative expression but unsuccessful as creative communication. Since I am one of your readers and always interested in your poetry as well as philosophy, I would like to initiate a philosophical dialogue with you so that I can learn from your experience, knowledge and wisdom. This letter is not to criticize, rather to understand your point of view. It is inspired by friendly affection.

        In think for any meaningful dialogue we need to agree on some basic definitions or terms so that the message given is the same as message received. I would like you to share with me what you understand by the terms

Religion

Fundamentalism

Communism

Secularism

Humanism

and how your definitions are similar / different than the conventional understanding of these terms. My concern as your writer friend is that your creation might be communicating a very different message than what you had in your mind because words have their own mind and meaning which might be different than what the writer had in his mind. I would like to know not only WHAT YOU SAID but also WHAT YOU TRIED TO SAY because if someone asked me what was the message in Abrar’s creation, I would say, ‘It was as clear as mud”. In creative writing ambiguity or willful vagueness is welcome as it adds multiple layers of meanings but in essays and philosophical writings we need clarity of thought. In your mind were you writing as essay or a short story, a piece of creative writing or a philosophical writing?

                                                        Affectionately,

                                                        Sohail

August 1st, 2009

Send questions or comments to Family of the Heart