|
Thank you Mubasher
for using Muhammad Asad's translation of the Qur'an which is perhaps
one of the best, if not the best, translation and interpretations of
Islam's Holy Book in the English language. Strangely enough, and
sadly enough, not too many Pakistanis are aware of the fact that the
late Muhammad Asad (who was born leopold Weis on July 2, 1900, was
the son of a Jewish Rabbi, and converted/reverted to Islam in 1923,
and passed away in Spain in 1992) was not only one the greatest
Islamic scholar in the 20th Century, but also one of the authors of
Pakistan's Constitution (right after Independence), and worked for
the Pakistani UN Mission in New York, during which time he wrote his
magnificent book THE ROAD TO MICCA, recognized as one of the
most enchanting spiritual autobiographies ever written. (I have yet
to see a single Ph.D. thesis written about this giant Islamic
scholar and his enormous contributions to Pakistan in Particular and
to modern Islamic thought in general by a Pakistani student of
higher education, let alone other Muslim women/men of learning).
Be that as it may, Muslims and non-Muslims alike may be interested
to know that recently, and probably for the first time ever, a new
English translation of the Qur'an is published that reflects a
Feminist perspective. It is the remarkable achievement of Laleh
Bakhtiar, a Chicago Islamic scholar, whose translation of the Qur'an
is entitled THE SUBLIME QURAN. To her credit, she gently and
modestly states: "I dedicate this translation with the hope that
this humble effort will in some measure - through a fresh view of
Quranic discernment - improve understanding between Muslim men and
women."
She rightly points out that "This translation differs from previous
English translation in that there has been a conscious attempt to
present a translation of the sacred text that has internal
consistency and reliability. It is the first English translation
by an American woman who includes the view of women in the Signs
(verses) wherever relevant. The translation is consciously a
universal, inclusive one, widening the relevance of the sacred
text to a larger community." In this respect, and more to the
point, verses 31/32 of chapter 24 (al-Noor/The Light),
referred in Mubasher's posting, is translated as follows:
"Say to ones who are female believers to lower their (f) sight,
and keep their (f) private parts safe, and not show their (f)
adornment, except what is manifest of it; and let them (f) draw
their head covering over their (f) bosoms, and not show their (f)
adornments except to their (f) husbands, or their (f) fathers, or
the fathers of their (f) husbands, or their sons or the sons of
their (F) husbands, or their (f) brothers, or the sons of their (f)
brothers, or the sons of their (f) sisters, or their (f) women that
their (f) right hands possess, or males, the ones who have no sexual
desire, or children to whom nakedness of women has not been
manifest; and let them (f) not stomp their feet so as to make known
what they (f) conceal of their adornment. Turn to God altogether for
forgiveness, O ones who believe, so that perhaps you would prosper."
Instead of leading to "confusion," as Mubasher asserted, the verse
actually highlights one of the major principles embodied in the
Qur'an, namely, the deliberate presence of "unspecificity" in order
to allow for the all important need for modifications and
adaptations pertaining to changing times and places, including
social , geographic, environmental, and socio-economic conditions.
Within this context, Farzan Hassan was correct when she asserted
that the Qur'an neither requires the wearing of the so-called Hijab
nor calls for punishing those who chose not to wear it. Freedom of
choice is fundamental in Islam, and any form of "forced piety" is
nothing more than a farce.
On the other hand, I tend to agree with Dr. Qazi's assertion to the
effect that as living realities, religions, including Islam, have to
be assessed on the basis of the actions they inspire among the
believers. Within this context, Islam has inspired its believers to
produce some of the most outstanding and enduring noble
deeds/achievements, including the building of its rich, vibrant, and
highly sophisticated civilization, as well as to engage in countless
disgraceful deeds, including the oppression, even the killing of
women in the name of "honour" and/or "purity."
I happen to believe that one of the most important reasons
responsible for the abuse of Islam by so-called Muslims (e.g., the
father of the innocent Aqsa Parvez) is, strange as it may seem,
IGNORANCE of the basic tenets that constitute what can be described
as Islam's world view. These tenets include the principles of
Tawheed (Unity of God, and extension, the Unity of Creation,
including males and females of course), Ilm (Knowledge),
Adl (Justice), Khilafa (Trusteeship, which by definition,
embodies person responsibility and accountability, and Tasamoh
(Tolerance, which is the logical requirement/implication of the
divinely willed human diversity). In this respect, I strongly
recommend the following highly relevant readings:
1) "Believing Women" in Islam: Unreading Patriarchal
Interpretations of the Qur'an. By Prof. Asma Barlas;
2) Qur'an and Woman. By Prof. Amina Wadud;
3) Major Themes of the Qur'an. By the late prof. Fazlur
Rahman;
4) Islam and the Destiny of Man. By Charles Le Gai Eaton;
5) The Vision of Islam. By Sachiko Murata and William
Chittick; and
6) The Heart of Islam: Enduring Values for Humanity. By prof.
Seyyed Hossein Nasr.
With the best of wishes for a Happy and Prosperous New Year for all.
Ibrahim Hayani
|