Response to Post 45 – from Lahore’s barber shops:

 

I wonder if New York Times is an expert agency in forensics to correctly identify a forgery? If so, how come they were in the forefront in pushing for Iraq invasion on the grounds of Saddam’s weapons of mass destruction which were not found because they never existed? Heaps of documents were floating around to make the case for the invasion but I do not recall NYT doing the forensics bid to avert the invasion.

 

After reading a host of articles from around the globe and knowing BB’s performance, assisted by her husband, the circumstantial evidence would overwhelmingly support for a high probability for the letter to be genuine. Also knowing that there was nothing the feudal princess would not do to gain personal power and furthering the cause of PPP Dynasty, would point in the same direction.

 

Javed I. Chaudry