Akber Choudhry

Jan. 14, 2007

Like Shah of Iran no country was ready to accept Saddam the Lion whose mouth was dripping with blood of innocent men women and children.


All the world is asking for is proof.  The credibility of Western media and governments is shot.

Mr. Haider stole my Car?
================

Please read some excerpts at the end. By the way are you the same person who wrote eulogy for that petty Jordanian thief and mass murderer of Muslims the Tiger Zarqawi? Forgive me if I am wrong


Haider Sahib, are you the person who stole my car last night? If not, sorry, wrong Haider. :)  I swear I saw you, but again, I have never seen you.  Ha ha ha.  Before making a public statement, verify the facts.  If in doubt, email or call.  If you continue with such garbage, it is just another underhanded tactic.

You have tried to bring Quran and Muhammad (saw) into the discussion twice.  Once regarding Hijrah, and the other time 'whoever kills one person'.  Again, either study the whole Quran and Muhammad's life, and just don't pick up bits and pieces to justify your argument.  That, again, is dishonest.

Hijrah and the life of Muhammad(saw)
===========================
Muhammad (saw) migrated to Medina after he had sent off most or all of his companions.  Also, Muhammad saw) meted absolute justice to traitors or those who conspired with foreign powers, or those that broke agreements.  These covenants are what make nations from individuals - take out these covenants and nations cease to exist.  In that way, Saddam mirrored the practice of Muhammad (saw) by being ruthless on traitors and those conspiring with Iran or the U.S.

Am I saying that Saddam can be compared to Muhammad (saw) in any way? Of course not.  I am just showing you how one thing, taken out of context, can lead to the wrong conclusions.

Killing One Person is equal to Killing All Humanity
====================================
 

This phrase is trotted out by people to justify anything and everything.  Which ruler in this world has not caused people to die? Or, sent people to be executed?  Is that murder?  Or conducted war?  Or instructed police to apprehend criminals and traitors?  Or not ordered deserters and spies executed?

Is the executioner ever held liable for the person he hanged. No. He is acting on behalf of the state.  The judiciary pronounces a sentence, and the executive has to carry it out.  The judge does not kill himself.

For God's sake, differentiate between cold-blooded murder and the person acting in the capacity of an Omnipotent and Sovereign State.  Civics 101.