My previous badly
composed and grammatically incorrect mails disturbed few" linguists"
of this forum which honestly makes me embarrassed. In fact our
relationship with this language is not simple . I see it as
slave-master relationship and the way I was stoned or
criticized endorsed my observation that no matter how civilize and
educated we are, we cannot help our prejudice views or innate or
inherent complexities. I fully agree with points you raise about my
incompetent and weak expression. I hope i will improve it but dear
forum readers its not my native language, i learned it as foreign
language and it takes years to master writing styles. honestly i
have no intension for that. Though i know i can write much better
than this but here in Dubai, hardly i have any time to read and
write.
I read your post
carefully and like the way you mentioned iqbal and Huxley. I re
read your post to find your own findings but I failed. You did not
bother to answer the simplest question which I raised in my
previous post. That is , do u ever try to know your self? take it
under the ancient wisdom" Know Thy Self". Most of us believe that we
know yourself very well. My whole point is that before knowing God
why don't we give a simple try to know yourself, we may find few
surprising facts.
thirdly, you
mentioned Iqbal in both of your posts which raised my eye brows. It
gives me pleasant feeling that you consider him. Normally people
with modern thoughts or non-believers ignores him. to me iqbal as
the noblest and highly respected scholar but regrettably I never
consider him philosopher. To understand it we have to differentiate
between Philosophy and scholastics. in scholastism ( Ilme Kalam) we
believe in God and then solve the mysteries, in philosophy we
suppose that and try to reach the reality by inductive or
deductive logic. So Iqbal as we all know him as great believer,
cannot be taken as Nitchze or Kiekegard or Spinoza.
I as a sincere
person read most of western philosophers and liked these three for
there great contributions to human history. interestingly i try
nitcheze recently again, Thus spake Zarathustra, It makes me smile.
The highest point they achieve as greatest discovery is happen to be
a starting point in most of eastern esoteric disciplines. That is
why I am not giving any reference of any person no matter how big
reputation he carries. we have to discover our own truth within our
own selves. We know that universities and schools are full of
professors and lecturers who are writing and debating on
philosophers and poets and people of this sort. i suggest you to
send your respected assignments to good universities and colleges
where amicable people related to this field evaluate it. this forum
is may not be proper place for it.
I request to every
reader of this forum to think over one simple thing. Do we know our
selves? Don't say good bye to God, say good bye to this despicable
impulsive idea. Logically negation of god is reverse assertion,
because how can we say no to something which is not there.
Today I saw Mr
Nauroz A Wein post, I would like to ask him one question. what is
this 'wein' as he said he came from ' Muslim back ground' which
means he is no more a Muslim or does not believe any more in this
religion, so what is your new religion? and does this new faith
allows you to carry such a shallow identity of cast with him?
secondly you ended your post with saif-ul-malook's fame mian sabs
verse, "masjid ta........" please don't take it in its obvious
meaning, its subliminal, being son of poet you may understand what
is subliminal. And I appreciate you to bring in the notice of many
people that Hinduism is truly Monotheistic religion, yes, that's
very true. And dear Mr Nauroz I would love to record my detail
observation on your post, now I am pending it on next. Briefly I
congratulate you for entering into the " danishwer" world.