“Let there be no
compulsion in matters of faith
Truth become clearer as
error fades …”
(Qur’an – 2:256)
Dear Mr. Mughal,
The question you have
asked at the end of your letter is of fundamental significance for
today’s Muslims and I am pleased that you raised it up. It stares
right into their eyes and has elicited their response in different
ways. I believe answer to this question will determine the future
development of “Muslim Intelligentsia” and ultimately, of the
masses. This question if tackled in a traditional way will require
dealing with “theology” but I would like to address it with an
understanding that comes from looking at the “heart” behind the
matter, and not as a theological exercise. I believe that the root
cause of much dissension especially about religion is the tendency
to fall prey to literalism. As I said in the earlier letter,
what lies ahead
of us more than anything else is developing the habit of
knowing
that “heart”
which lies behind all those works of art, literature,
science, philosophy and religion.
If we think of it we
will find that the basic misunderstanding very often is about
the terminology. That is why I referred to Socrates in my article
saying if you want to debate with me, first define your terms”. We
have to know what “Kufar” or “Kafir” really means. I quote here a
few verses of Qur’an in which some form of “K f r” is used. I am
showing both transliteration and translation (by Yousuf Ali). First
the full verse, which is quoted by you, reads as follows:
2:98 Man kana
AAaduwwan lillahi wamalaikatihi warusulihi wajibreela
wameekala fainna Allaha AAaduwwun
lilkafireena
“Whoever is an enemy
to Allah and His angels and apostles, to Gabriel and Michael,- Lo!
Allah is an enemy to those who
reject Faith.”
Now let us read following verses containing some form of ‘k f r’
14:7
Waith taaththana rabbukum lain shakartum
laazeedannakum walain
kafartum
inna AAathabee lashadeedun
“And remember! Your
Lord caused to be declared (publicly): "If ye are grateful, I will
add more (favours) unto you; but if ye show
ingratitude,
truly My punishment is terrible indeed."”
14:18
Mathalu allatheena
kafaroo
birabbihim
aAAmaluhum karamadin
ishtaddat bihi alrreehu fee yawmin AAasifin la
yaqdiroona mimma kasaboo AAala shayin thalika
huwa alddalalu albaAAeedu
“The parable of those
who reject
their Lord is that their works are as ashes, on which the wind blows
furiously on a tempestuous day: No power have they over aught that
they have earned: that is the straying far, far (from the goal).
14:22 Waqala
alshshaytanu lamma qudiya alamru inna
Allaha waAAadakum waAAda alhaqqi wawaAAadtukum
faakhlaftukum wama kana liya AAalaykum min sultanin
illa an daAAawtukum faistajabtum lee fala
taloomoonee waloomoo anfusakum ma ana bimusrikhikum
wama antum bimusrikhiyya innee
kafartu
bima ashraktumooni min qablu
inna alththalimeena
lahum AAathabun aleemun
“And
Satan will say when the matter is decided: "It was Allah Who gave
you a promise of Truth: I too promised, but I failed in my promise
to you. I had no authority over you except to call you but ye
listened to me: then reproach not me, but reproach your own souls. I
cannot listen to your cries, nor can ye listen to mine. I
reject your former act
in associating me with Allah. For wrong-doers there must be a
grievous penalty."
I
believe the term (Kufar) refers more to an attitude towards life,
and universe and towards our own selves than towards accepting or
rejecting a “diety”. (This comment can start another thread of
discussion relating to the understanding of “Allah” as expounded in
Qur’an but we will not go into that here). An attitude of Kufar is
an attitude of being ungrateful towards life’s blessings, an
attitude of not accepting that there is a reality beyond the
apparent and an attitude of general denial towards open-mindedness.
This attitude resulted seeing Mohammad’s message only as a threat to
the economic interests of Qurayish who were the custodian of Kaaba
which housed all the idols of Arabia. This attitude kept their eyes
closed to the true nature of the message and resulted in so much
dissension and violence that Mohammad has to deal with.
The development of Qura’nic
lexicon
into theological
terminology was
done later in the history and conforms more to the later day demands
of social order. If we really want to understand Qur’an and the
person of Mohammad, we have to really come to grip with the
spiritual side of it and not just the legal and social aspect of it.
Unfortunately, the former has not received enough attention from the
Intelligentsia as it rightly deserves and the latter has got too
much attention from all and sundry.
The other aspect to consider is that Qur’an in many places has
exalted people of Jewish and Christian faith (People of Book). And
also has clearly stated that there is no compulsion in religion.
Consider following:
3:113: Not all of them are alike: Of
the People of the Book are a portion that stand (For the right):
They rehearse the Signs of Allah all night long, and they prostrate
themselves in adoration. They believe in Allah and the Last Day;
they enjoin what is right, and forbid what is wrong; and they hasten
(in emulation) in (all) good works: They are in the ranks of the
righteous. Of the good that they do, nothing will be rejected of
them; for Allah knoweth well those that do right.
(Note the use of word ‘Allah’ in describing faith and religious
practices of the People of Book)
3:75 Among the People of the Book
are some who, if entrusted with a hoard of gold, will (readily) pay
it back
2:112 whoever submits His whole self
to Allah and is a doer of good,- He will get his reward with his
Lord; on such shall be no fear, nor shall they grieve”
The “no-compulsion verse” is translated by Yousuf Ali as follows:
2:256
Let there be no compulsion in
religion: Truth stands out clear from Error. Whoever rejects evil
and believes in Allah hath grasped the most trustworthy hand-hold,
that never breaks”
My own poetic
rendering of this verse is as follows:
“Let there be no
compulsion in matters of faith
Truth become clearer as
error fades
Truth is stronger and
will firmly hold
In hearts of those who
once behold
God’s truth, and in
that they believe
To idol worship they
never recede”
In the final
analysis, the question becomes which line of thinking will we
follow. This question highlights the fact that we (all mankind –not
only Muslims) are standing at a crossroad. At this crossroad we have
to claim responsibility for our further development. An important
step in that direction is to get rid of literalism and sow seeds of
an understanding of the true nature of humanity’s heritage, which
includes heritage of religio-spiritual works much like the heritage
of works of art and literature. Now, forgive me for repeating, but
this is becoming my slogan:
“What lies
ahead of us more than anything else is developing the habit of
knowing
that “heart” which
lies behind all those works of art, literature, science, philosophy
and religion”