ABDUL MUTAAL

 

 

I am no intellectual and I am no writer, but I do want to express my opinions without being opinionated. And I do find this question interesting enough to muse over, though as I said, I do not claim to be qualified enough to really answer it with justice, rather I am just exploring it further. Secondly, I waited enough to see if anyone among many well-informed and scholarly participants in this forum will respond to this question.

Very strangely, some question seemingly simple may be expounded in quite a detail and this question suspiciously appears to be of that category.

Which term is used for a group of people who believes on God but does not believe on any religion past or present?

I wrestled with it a little bit because this provided me chance to explore some interesting things. In fact, the whole discussion of evolutionists vs. creationists rests on some of the assumptions built into this question. In my own account of the seminar I tried to bring up to the surface some of the ‘priory’ assumptions, some of the fundamental thought patterns, which creates the dilemma inherent in the discussion.

In fact, there may not be any dilemma if we check our ‘priories’ first. As far as this question is concerned there is a relatively simple answer at the end of this discourse, which I found in a book, but before that I would like to put forward following questions so that some of the conceptual categories inherent in this topic may be dissected in order to be better able to see it in a broader perspective.

What we really mean by God?

God has many names and each name may signify different variations of divinity to different people. But beyond the name how ‘God’ is seen, felt or thought over by people?

What we mean by religion?

Can there be any group of people whose members can have identical belief?

What is belief?

Even within every religion there are so many sets of beliefs and creeds. What is the value of labeling people in one way or other?

What we mean by believing in religion?

Individuals may internalize, to varying degrees, the words we hear, which we think are expressing our beliefs.

Can God only be seen in relation to humans?

Like the famous question ‘ Will there be light if there are no eyes?’ this may also be asked,

“Will there be God if there were no humans?”

 To explain little further: light is small band of electromagnetic waves spectrum but is not ‘seen’ by eyes or even by nervous system as such. It is reinterpreted. It becomes a word. Can there be the word ‘light’ if there are no eyes? This does not prove anything either way. It only points towards the body of knowledge called ‘epistemology’ which needs to be incorporated in any study of religion or science.

Now for a simple answer to this question I quote from the book, “The World’s Religions” by Huston Smith,

“In The Brothers Karamazov Dostoevsky has Ivan blurt out: "I don't accept this world of God's, and although I know it exists, I don’t accept it at all. It's not that I don't accept God, you must understand, it's the world created by Him I don't and cannot accept."

Ivan is not alone in finding God, perhaps, good, but the world not. Entire philosophies have done the same - Cynicism in Greece, Jainism in India…..”

And probably Taoism in China. All these philosophies believe in a universal force = God which is not necessarily involved in human affairs, or some version of this concept.  I think, these philosophies do point out towards similar idea as put forward by Iffat Zehra.

At the end I would like to mention a saying of Plato, in which he likens the human condition to some cavemen who are tied at the entrance of a cave with their backs towards the opening, and all they can see are the shadows of their bodies playing on the wall of the cave, cast by the light from the open, and they take those shadows as reality of their being.

The ultimate question is that can humans transcend their thinking and their very being and come to know of a reality which is not comprehendible just with logic and reasoning but is just comprehendible by the so called ‘leap of faith’.

 

 
 

Send questions or comments to Pervaiz Salahuddin