FARZANA HASSAN

"Politics, Religion and Terrorism"

FAMILY OF THE HEART SEMINAR, DECEMBER 11, 2005


THE CHALLENGE OF THEORY AND PRACTICE OF

NONVIOLENCE IN THE AGE OF TERRORISM

 

Good Afternoon,
 
My name is Farzana Hassan and I wish to extend a warm welcome to all of you. You have braved the cold to come here and be a part of this very important exercise.  We are discussing Terrorism, its history, its root causes and it implications, but  we are also here to make a serious attempt at finding solutions and remedies to the growing threat of international Terrorism.   It is crucial that we all think about these issues long and hard, because the effects of Terrorism are felt universally. It creates fear in all of us.  Each one of us, sitting right here in this room is a potential victim because Terrorism kills indiscriminately. It can kill on the plane, on the train and at work.
 
We also need to delve deep into the psychology of terror. We have often heard that the survival instinct is paramount in human beings. What is it then, that drives a person to tie a belt of explosives around his belly, killing not only himself but a whole bunch of innocent bystanders around him?
 
Again, we must also explore the ideological roots of Terrorism.  While Islam strictly prohibits Terrorism targeting civilians, there is a prevalent view among theologians that it may endorse militancy, which may translate into acts of terror when implemented by extremists.  Although this is true of all  Abrahamic faiths, it is Jihad and its contemporary posture as a religio-political doctrine that thrives today as a lived ideology. We can no longer afford to be evasive about the issue by suggesting Jihad is merely a personal struggle to fight ones evil inclinations. Although politically correct, such a view would be disingenuous, to say the least.  It is therefore essential to examine the concept by comparing it to Buddhist ideology, for example. The Dalai Lama has always preached a philosophy of non-violence even though Tibetan Buddhists have suffered persecution and subjugation for a very long time. Canada too, has had to deal with a secessionist movement, yet it is not part of Canada's political culture to resort to violence in order to  solve conflicts.  What is it about certain ideologies that encourage violence and militancy?
 
One often hears the view that Muslims are in denial about Islamic Terrorism.  They feel that those who are depicted as culprits in the media aren't really the true culprits. Several conspiracy theories have been floated around about the 9/11 attacks and other terrorist activity.  We therefore need to examine the validity of the conspiratorial viewpoint as well.
 
Non-violence must be preached as the only option available to subjugated people because it has moral ascendancy.  We must refrain from seeking moral equivalencies between Islamic terrorism and Western military action. The two issues must be dealt with separately. Any cause and effect linkage between the two
amounts to justifying Terrorism. There can be no justification for it whatsoever.
 
Before me is a learned panel of speakers who will examine these issues in depth.

 

Farzana Hassan

http://farzanahassan.com
http://islamtoday.ca